When buyers ask AI who to buy from, are you the answer?
Enter your brand and competitors. We run your buyers' real questions live across the models behind ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, score your share of AI voice, and email you the findings with the fix plan. You watch it happen.
- Live queries, not a simulation: you see every answer's verdict
- Competitor share-of-voice, engine by engine
- Optional monthly re-run with change alerts
AI model families queried live 8
buyer questions per run 1
fix plan, mapped to causes
Built for brands with named competitors: SaaS, fintech, ecommerce, marketplaces, services. The audit asks the questions your buyers ask AI assistants and checks who gets recommended. A work email on your company's domain is required, because the report contains competitive data. Results reflect live model answers at run time and naturally vary: it's a diagnostic, not a guarantee.
What the audit actually measures
Share of AI voice
Across every answer, how often you're recommended versus mentioned versus absent, weighted by strength, against your named competitors.
Where you lose, specifically
Per-prompt, per-engine verdicts. Losing "best X for Y" on Perplexity is a different problem from losing "alternatives to competitor" on ChatGPT.
Why, and the fix
The findings layer reads the answers themselves: what the engines cite, which attributes they associate with winners, and the fix sequence that follows.
Fair questions
Are these real queries or a simulation?
Real. Each row you watch complete is a live API call to that provider's model (the same model families behind ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini) with a question your buyer would plausibly ask. Answers vary run to run, which is exactly why the monthly monitor exists: one snapshot is a data point, a trend is the truth.
Why do you need my email before running it?
Each audit costs real compute across four AI model families, and the full findings report is built for reading, not skimming on a results screen. The email is where it lands. No sequence follows unless you opted into monitoring.
How is this different from HubSpot's grader or the enterprise trackers?
The free graders run generic prompts and give you a one-time score with no competitor surface and no tracking. The enterprise trackers are excellent and start around $29 to $500 a month. This sits between: your real competitors, your buyer's phrasing, a fix plan written by an operator, and a free monthly trend if you want it.
What do you do with the results?
They go to you, and they inform the fix plan if we end up working together. Aggregated, anonymized patterns (never your brand data) sharpen the prompt battery over time.